The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
So then you can complain you have to "drop everything" to make them into actual articles within a week? I don't care if sources exist, don't make junk one-liners.
Reywas92Talk16:06, 19 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Acknowledging your request for me to stop creating stubs, I'd argue adding tags prompts action and is more constructive than attempting to mass delete entries about notable topics. We don't have to agree. ---
Another Believer(
Talk)16:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep to Neutral ( Updated per below comment by nominator.) This is an one star
Michelin restaurant. Per
WP:CORPDEPTH, If the list itself is notable, such as the Fortune 500 and the Michelin Guide, the inclusion counts like any other reliable source, but it does not exempt the article from the normal value of providing evidence that independent sources discuss the subject, therefore I disagree that this reference is PR or clickbait. Unfortunately lots of sources are listicles but
Time Out has a lengthy review that appears to meet
WP:CORPDEPTH.
The New York Times also appears to cover this in
three paragraphs, so it's probably debatable regarding whether CORPDEPTH is met. With those two references that count towards CORPDEPTH IMO and one being debatable, I currently am at neutral to weak keep. VickKiang(talk)06:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment As it has a single Michelin star, it should have decent coverage and be notable. I'll take a look at these refs, later today/tonight. If they are decent, I will withdraw the nomination. scope_creepTalk10:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)reply
To my opinion it is more a task for the original poster to improve the article and show the notability. In the present state, it is not really worth keeping. The Bannertalk10:48, 19 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.