The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep It's been officially announced, and reliable sources are reporting on it. Much like
Project Cafe after it was offically announced in April, there will be plenty of reliably-sourced speculation on it as well (if there isn't already).
Sergecross73msg me00:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)reply
A quick google search show that there has been an "Iwata Asks" on that shows more details. Info on it
here. Info is out there, it just hasn't been added to the article yet...
Sergecross73msg me01:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Very Strong Keep. High profile release in a very important and best selling series. New information should come fairly fast too.--
Hadomaru (
talk)
06:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep - There are plenty of sources that could be used for the article. A sequel has been talked about for years, and the subject is notable. Blake(
Talk·
Edits)00:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete - It doesn't exist. It doesn't have a name. Sure the 3DS is out, but if they're planning a joint Wii U/3DS release, well the Wii U is a prototype that won't be out for a year; so this nameless game that isn't even being developed at this time won't be out before the Wii U launches, so to begin it this year and rush it might give it a 2012 release. But that's speculative and I'm trailing off. My point is keeping an article for the game at this stage is a stupid idea, because there's no game to cover. Just a couple of quotes about what could appear in a game that will probably happen, but at the moment, isn't. Everything in the article is better suited to redirect to an appropriate section of the Super Smash Bros. series' article.
Digitelle (
talk)
16:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Existence is not a criteria for whether or not it should have an article. (See
Chrono Break, for example. Not only does it have an article, but it has been qualified a
good article..) What matters is that it is getting coverage from reliable, third party sources. This game has been confirmed to be developed straight from Nintendo, and, the last time I checked, has coverage from 3+ separate reliable sources as well.
Sergecross73msg me22:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC)reply
DeleteWP:HAMMER, plenty of room within the series article to cover the future title until a name is known and more details besides just its announcement are available. --
MASEM (
t)
00:22, 16 June 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.