The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Thank you
James Richards, i have tagged a request for Edit, it is not my intention to make it in a promotional context, Kindly advice what should be done for it to be neutral/meet Wikipedia Standard. I look forward to becoming a better contributor.
Mark Mulwanyi (
talk)
19:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Note Like Jake Brockman I am also too involved in trying to assist the creating editor to make a 'Delete vs Keep' !vote. The editor is receptive to help and guidance. While the editor is finding his way might I suggest Draftify in order to allow him to continue under
WP:AFC guidance?
FiddleFaddle10:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Has
WP:BEFORE been abandoned? This book apparently has significant press coverage, an award, and is on a national curriculum. Deletion is not cleanup, so promotional or CoI issues should be handled elsewhere. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits12:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment. I find the addition to the national curriculum significant, but the award is likely minor, and the so is the press coverage - I have serious doubts about the reliability of sources, much of the press coverage is a
WP:INTERVIEW. I guess per
WP:SYSTEMICBIAS we can lump all of that coverage and the award together and argue they make up for the second source... And try to ignore that the article reads like a promotional piece :/ --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here04:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.