The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Ugh. Delete hastily as a neologism. On the talk page, the author of the page declares they want to be "ahead of the curve" or some such nonsense and get the article up before the term is popular.
WP:ISNOT a derogatory-slang crystal ball.
JDoorjamTalk21:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
If consensus, which seems inevitable, is reached for deletion, do so on the original grounds of non-notable (which is yet to be seen) neologism; With regards to the idea of hate speech or attack page, the entry is clearly neither, as the base reference is qualified and cultural influence is explained, and the allegations themselves are inflammatory. You may find the page ridiculous, which is your prerogative, but those implications surpass it. The page disparages no particular being, item or other entity.
ToxinX
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.