The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak merge: To
List of Mortal Kombat characters. One of the few AFDs for Mortal Kombat characters I can get behind. And on one I personally
created 11 years ago, no less. Maybe he would have had a chance if he was playable in MKX or MK11, particularly if he was DLC, but he wasn't. The coverage he has at
Anime News Network is pretty good (which was since removed from the article, for some reason), and I'm not completely anti-listicle like some editors are, but I'm not seeing much in these listicles. So that's only one good source. That said, I have no prejudice towards reaction should more coverage on him pops up in the future.
MoonJet (
talk)
05:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Hi. Over the past five months we’ve had a bit of a fire sale with MK characters who no longer meet notability requirements for individual articles, mostly due to lack of significant coverage or few playable appearances. So far it’s Motaro, Sheeva, Cyrax, Sektor, Rain, Skarlet, Sindel, and just recently Baraka, Shinnok, Kabal, and Smoke. Jade may join the crowd soon as she is currently up for AfD.
sixtynine• whaddya want? •03:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge I am not a fan of the constant nominations of MK characters recently, and I'm not even a MK fan, but they just are not notable. At all. I just wish the nominations were spaced out more.
QuicoleJR (
talk)
14:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)reply
@
GlatorNator: I do suggest a Noob Saibot and Quan Chi AfD. Saibot has one good piece of significant coverage (the Polygon piece), but that alone is not sufficient for
WP:GNG. Quan Chi doesn't seem to have any.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
05:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Ultimately all arguments in favor of keeping are emotionally motivated. These articles were all split in the past by fans, when that really shouldn't have been done. This isn't about having a vendetta about some series and anyone who says so is unfamiliar with Wikipedia policy. But I will gladly do so if you don't wish to have too much attention.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
12:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.