The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (
talk) 00:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)reply
Not notable - holds an obscure local Democratic party office.
Sylvain1972 (
talk) 14:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep. His notability is indicated in his RS coverage, and a number of such articles over a number of years are clearly indicated in the article.--
Epeefleche (
talk) 16:36, 10 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Ynot? 00:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)reply
Relisting - syntax was broken, so this AfD fell through the cracks. -- Ynot? 00:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep. Dude's not the most famous, but enough third party cites over the years tip me to saying "keep" with
Epeefleche. --
Quartermaster (
talk) 02:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete A collection of very local pieces of coverage about very much a local politician does not make for "significant coverage". And we have to bear in mind that he fails - by a wide margin - the notability standards that the community has set for persons of his profession.--
Mkativerata (
talk) 02:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep as per
WP:POLITICIAN. The subject has obviously received "significant press coverage".
Guoguo12--Talk-- 16:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.