The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (
talk) 00:39, 21 January 2010 (UTC)reply
does not reach notability standards, contains mostly original research
Aliciakeyzz (
talk) 22:07, 14 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep. Being a candidate for governor is a strong case for specific notability, and there are a good number of secondary sources listed. Improvement, not deletion, should be the order of the day for this article. —C.Fred (
talk) 22:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC)reply
He is not a candidate for governor yet, he has merely said he will seek the nomination. That doesn't mean squat in terms of notability. Dozens of people try to get their parties nomination for president every 4 years, over 100 people were in the race for governor of California a few years ago. Besides, see
Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Politicians, just being a candidate for office does NOT make someone notable. TJSpyke 22:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment. He may be notable as a former chief of staff to a U.S. Senator. I do not know how much media coverage he received in that role. – Eastmain (
talk) 23:17, 14 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep. He served as the Chief of Staff of a high profile United States Senator for 15 years with plenty of media attention. He is an announced candidate for Governor of Maine with GOBS of media attention. I don't see how there is even a question about notability here.
FreeRight (
talk) 02:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep.There is no question about his significance as a state politician and certainly no question in terms of his run for governorship. If you read the article, it states that he announced candidacy on January 12, 2010. You can see addition sources in the article to prove this.
Crimsonator (
talk) 3:08, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.