The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:NPOL and
WP:GNG as a non-notable write-in candidate who received minimal coverage from local sources eight years ago. An obscure third-party run does not confer notability.
KidAd (
talk)
22:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Being a fringe party candidate for president is not an automatic inclusion freebie that exempts a person from having to clear
WP:GNG on the sourcing, but the sources here aren't getting him over GNG — five of the seven footnotes are
WP:PRIMARYSOURCES that are not support for notability at all, such as the
self-published content of his own political party and a government document. And while the other two are from real media, one's a low-power community radio station and the other is an alt-weekly newspaper, which does not add up to enough coverage to get him over GNG if it's all you can find.
Bearcat (
talk)
17:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.