The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article is currently blank, but previous versions of the article reveal a pattern of POV statements, ridiculous claims, and general nonsense. I don't think this is salvageable. Delete. --
Elkman - (talk)05:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep and write a good, serious article to deter future mischief. It's a real school that is notable and merits an article under our school policy. At least leave open for recreation.
Daniel Case05:22, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong keep and put it on watchlist. It's a real school, and a proneness to vandalism shouldn't bar it from being documented on wikipedia. I'll keep it on my watchlist and revert all crap edits.
Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr.12:53, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep I elaborated a bit on the stub. If getting vandalized repeatedly was a reason for deletion, we'd have a very small encyclopedia. I think it is easily salvagable, the school's information is easily verifyable if a couple serious editors took the time to do it. Though I do question its notability, but standard operating procedure seems to be to add just about every school whether it is really all that notable or not. -
Dawson23:20, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.