- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 07:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Star Moffatt ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unelected political hopeful planning to stand for election in 2016. There is no indication of notability and the article was created by someone with an apparent (though denied) conflict of interest. Clear failure of WP:POLITICIAN and speedy deletion candidate - although not so nominated because this has already been proposed for deletion (and contested by the author). See the talk page for discussion with the author - they Really Want the article to be kept but have offered nothing to justify it. RichardOSmith ( talk) 19:03, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 00:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. (Note: I was made aware of this AfD by a note on my talk page, presumably because I was the original PROD-er.) G S Palmer ( talk • contribs) 00:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:53, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:53, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 20:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 20:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails Wikipedia's criteria for notability. She sounds like an interesting person, and maybe if she really does run for office in 2 years she will become more notable. And of course, if she wins election to the state senate she will automatically qualify for an article. But merely saying that you'd like to run for office, several years from now when becomes possible to actually run - that is not enough to qualify for inclusion in an international encyclopedia. -- MelanieN ( talk) 21:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not really an article but text of a campaign card. Billy Hathorn ( talk) 04:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - WP:SNOW. Plenty of WP:NOT and WP:BIO issues. --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.