The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete -
Liberatore(
T) 20:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per all above Where(talk) 14:52, 25 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete, clearly crystal ball, but this brings up a question I have. Recently I have seen a lot of {{future game}} and {{future album}} tags on articles. It's been worrying me that these are clearly violating
WP:NOT by their very existence. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? (I ask here because I figure the people reading AfD's are the most likely to care about such issues.) --
Deville (
Talk) 14:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Well if the game or album has been officially announced, and there is
verifiable information, I dont see a problem with such articles. Rampant speculation like in this article is different IMO though. jacoplane 15:03, 25 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Agreed, if there is verifiable information, I can see the use of such a tag. Perhaps I should say more and state that most of the pages I've seen with this tag are totally crystal-balled out. Maybe I should restate my original comment and say that this tag tends to strongly encourage violations of
crystal ballism. --
Deville (
Talk) 18:15, 25 March 2006 (UTC)reply
In this particular case
Starcraft: Ghost is the title in development (though what's going to happen with it is up in the air at the moment). Starcraft 2, as separate from Starcraft: Ghost, is wishful thinking on the part of some fans.
Kiti 00:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Merge with or redirect to
StarCraft or perhaps
StarCraft Secret Missions. But, to be honest, most of the information is copied from other articles, so only a little needs to be moved.
Kimera757 02:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete: As much as I want StarCraft 2, this article has not a shred of fact in it.
Dread Lord CyberSkull✎☠ 23:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete there is no evidence that this game is being planned or in production. --
Polkapunk 18:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.