The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 17:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Two years ago this software was at AfD and no consensus was the answer. It has not improved in the intervening two years. It isn't notable, doesn't make a claim to be notable. It has no references. There are a handful of external links to reviews, most of which are on user submitted sites or copies of PR. If the list of features was cut, there is no unique information to merge anywhere else. Wikipedia is not a software directory, and Wikipedia is not here to promote products uncovered by mainstream sources. Miami33139 ( talk) 21:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC) reply