The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I don't think this meets
WP:NALBUM. Practically all of the sources used in the article are either unreliable or situational (which usually can't be used for notability). Film Music Reporter usually isn't reliable as per
this discussion. Screen Rant cannot be used to demonstrate notability per
WP:VG/S. Doing a
WP:BEFORE check, I don't see any reliable sources that specifically
covers the soundtrack.
Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs23:35, 17 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge back to film article. Very little to be said beyond a track list and an exhaustive list of "Songs that aren't on the soundtrack but appear in the movie anyways" which doesn't really fit the scope of such a spin out article.
Sergecross73msg me00:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep You have reviews of the soundtrack (like
this one), but particular songs or aspects of the score are mentioned in the film reviews. Lilke
Roger Ebert's for example, who did not like particularly the film but
states:
"Parents will enjoy some retro songs harking back to their middle school days like “
It’s Tricky” or “
This is How We Do It.” Grandparents are not overlooked; the soundtrack also features
Andy Williams and Norah Jones."
So, yes, this soundtrack is quite notable, overall or for
particular songs, and even the original score can be
sourced. And a dedicated page was therefore a good idea, as there is material to write a good page.—
MY, OH, MY!
09:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)reply
"Zanoboard Reviews" is not a reliable source source, and passing mentions from movie reviews is a pretty weak argument for splitting out an article like this. This isn't much of an argument for independent notability.
Sergecross73msg me10:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)reply
What the PRP is to the music world is probably on par with what the screenrants, gamerants, and thegamers websites are to the video game world - situationally usable but not an ideal source or much of an argument for notability.
Sergecross73msg me13:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Reply:Just replying here to
User:Pizzaplayer219 on the last part of their comment above: the insertion by me of a link in your text was obviously unintentional and I did not mean to edit anything in your text. But, as I said in reply to the template you left on my tp, sincerely sorry for that.
17:53, 18 May 2023 (UTC)—
MY, OH, MY!reply
Comment: While I am it: there is also have
this review of the soundtrack( in French), for example, and their site is quite reliable. Independently, the size of the main article (film) plus the fact that the page on the soundtrack has a partially list-like format would make, if remerged, the page not easily readable (let alone convenient to expand). I am sure it is not necessary to direct anyone to WP pages about this. —
MY, OH, MY!
17:53, 18 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge I wanted to !vote Keep, but the sourcing isn't there. I guess it wasn't as impactful as the first film's soundtrack.
QuicoleJR (
talk)
21:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment No opinion here, but I'd like to note that Film Music Reporter is considered a reliable source, and is used on many high-quality articles (including GAs and FAs).
InfiniteNexus (
talk)
18:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC)reply
I don't know if there have been any actual discussions, but there is certainly
WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS for this, at least on film articles. It's usually only used to source track listing and album release dates anyway, which I assume they directly get from the studios/labels. Essentially, they're a press release outlet. (Can't be used to prove notability, obviously.)
InfiniteNexus (
talk)
17:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.