The result was keep the whole shebang. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:20, 11 April 2012 (UTC) reply
I'm sending a bunch of family-related articles to AFD. As counterintuitive and ridiculous as this nomination may seem (April Fools was a couple of days ago...), on close analysis there seems to be little if any sources in any of these articles (many of them not have not been touched or significantly altered in years). There is a surprising amount of reliance on dic. defs and encyclopedia entries without much else. Also, I'm just not sure where one would go to find sources on these topics. I looked up "nephew" on google and got next to nothing. Perhaps for "son" and "daughter" we could find and add stuff that are probably in our more specific articles (like first-birth right) but ironically not here. For "cousin" we could grab some stuff about the legality and acceptance of cousin-relationships and put it in there. Disownment seems very notable but at the moment is has no sources at all. I'm afraid the others may be doomed to a life on Wiktionary. I suppose a mass-merge is possible.
Coin945 (
talk)
06:29, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
reply
This nomination will radically change Template:Family. It might be a good idea to bring this into the discussion as well.
Also nominating:
-- Coin945 ( talk) 06:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC) reply