The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Qualified for deletion under G5, as being created by the blocked user
user:Ratherbe2000. Was, in my opinion, incorrectly removed by another editor ignoring WP policy regarding sock article creation. This should be procedurely deleted so as to not encourage sock creation of articles.
Onel5969TT me02:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)reply
comment for anyone. It also carries the risk of subsequent surreptitious resurrection of removed contents by those who holds direct or indirect vested interests through single purpose puppets long after the set of editors involved in the discussion have moved-on or no longer paying attention to the article.
Graywalls (
talk)
19:37, 30 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Redirect to RuPaul’s Drag Race. Outside of all that... practically none of these sources give independent notability and like 80% of them aren’t even reliable.
Trillfendi (
talk)
03:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)reply
GretLomborg, If you're open to redirecting, would you note that here? I'm not sure there's much point in deleting the page altogether when the article's history may be helpful in the future and the redirect would serve a purpose by directing readers to the article for season 11? ---
Another Believer(
Talk)17:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Right, no one is suggesting she is notable just for being on a reality show. Can you at least comment on sourcing in some way since this is an AfD? ---
Another Believer(
Talk)17:55, 30 March 2019 (UTC)reply
delete and redirect to the season 11 since he was part of a show. Deleting it reduces the risk of surreptitious resurrection without triggering the new article creation scrutiny.
Graywalls (
talk)
20:17, 30 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
RuPaul's Drag Race (season 11). Redirects serve a purpose, and this is a prime example of when we would use a redirect. People searching for the subject will be directed to the appropriate season where they can get more information. --
Kbabej (
talk)
23:07, 30 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Redirect a customary solution here, and is sufficient until the subject becomes notable enough that some non-spa ever wants to do an article. DGG (
talk )
05:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.