- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Society for Clinical & Medical Hair Removal ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no evidence of notability ; the refs are merely listings. Nor would one expect more, as its certification applies only to a few states in the US. DGG ( talk ) 19:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as my searches noticeably found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 21:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:ORG. lacking indepth coverage. LibStar ( talk) 04:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.