- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:58, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Slavic World ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I propose to delete this article because of content forking. We already have an article for this topic ( Slavic languages). Fakirbakir ( talk) 15:20, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support. Other articles ( Slavs, Slavic languages) do a better job. Useful parts should move there.-- Rovibroni ( talk) 17:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. What about Celtic nations? -- Ghirla -трёп- 20:14, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Good point. It should be deleted as well (" Celts (modern)" is more appropriate for the subject). Fakirbakir ( talk) 21:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- keep, trivially, not a deletion candidate. Possibly merge, but seek consensus for that, don't try to just delete difficult articles when people aren't looking. -- dab (𒁳) 09:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Weak delete. I don't see why this cannot be redirected to Slavs. What's the difference? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Slavs or something like that. A google book search for the phrase shows thousands of hits, so it makes sense that we cover the search term, but it does seem like there's no sense in having a duplicate article. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 19:35, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. I noticed that the Romance and Germanic equivalents of this article are also listed for deletion. Should we be looking at these individually or altogether, because if one were deleted and another weren't, I don't think it'd make much sense. Basically, I think we keep them all or delete them all.
- And on a sidenote, I think 'W' in 'World' should be made lowercase. -- Local hero talk 18:49, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I see no point in a redirect--it's a very unlikely search term, and I think it only appears here because it to make a forked article. DGG ( talk ) 00:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.