The result was Nomination withdrawn. -- Longhair\ talk 09:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC) reply
After a month, this page still makes no case for notability, features no citations, orphaned, and little more content than a list of three presumably non-notable books.
MrZaius
talk 21:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Nom withdrawn, concerns adequately met.
MrZaius
talk
20:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
reply
"Doing Shakespeare is an original and long-overdue resource for theatre scholar-artists" (Ref 3). I do not see someone doing that without being a significant expert. "I cannot think of another critic since Empson who has teased out so much so lucidly and (usually) so persuasively from the intricacies of Shakespearean language" (ref 5). That seems significant to me. It is the basis of at least one course. I did not say leave it in place. I said I wanted an expert to come along and work on it and meant while this AfD is running. If nobody does, it probably will be deleted. I just do not think that makes the encyclopedia any better. I also note that there is considerable disagreement about the notability guidelines, particularly at WP:N. But anyway, I'm leaving it to others to judge the evidence and hopefully provide more. -- Bduke 03:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC) reply