The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment The Keep comment does not respond to the lack of significant third party coverage raised in the AfD. Also, the comment above breaches
WP:NPA and is not constructive. The articles submitted to AfD were detailed in another AfD
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nicholas_Bowen&oldid=686191498, by user
User:NewYorkActuary due to the similarities in terms of lack of significant third party coverage. Perhaps the article author could attach sources which demonstrate significant third party coverage to satisfy notability.
isfutile:P (
talk) 17:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect to award - lack of good coverage and the award doesn't mean probable notability. In a similar AfD, some found the award to be good enough, others didn't, that closed as no consensus so it's not really a strong reason for keeping. Other nominations haven't been speedy keep'd simply because of the award so they seem perfectly reasonable.
Rainbow unicorn (
talk) 17:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton |
Talk 00:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 18:49, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. does not meet WP:PROF (or the GNG) The Guardian item is a blog posting. DGG (
talk ) 04:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
There's rather a difference between a blog on blogspot and a blog in a national newspaper; I would regard the latter as the digital media equivalent of a column.--
Andreas Philopater (
talk) 06:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.