From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Shirley McKellar (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unprodded without rationale or improvement. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Onel5969 TT me 15:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Fails WP:NPOL and no other claim to notability under WP:GNG. AusLondonder ( talk) 07:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Per WP:NPOL, a person does not get a Wikipedia article just for being a candidate in an election she didn't win. If you cannot demonstrate and source that she was already notable enough for an article on some other notability criterion independent of her candidacy, then she has to win the election to get an article out of it, not merely be on the ballot. And the only other way around that is to show that she garnered a volume of coverage extremely disproportionate to what any candidate for office could routinely expect to receive — the Christine O'Donnell test — but the volume of sourcing shown here isn't even a fraction of one per cent of enough to clear that bar. Bearcat ( talk) 18:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - non-notable WP:POLITICIAN. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.