The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I don't understand the objection to having this as a separate article, unless there is another article giving a comprehensive treatment. While I agree the article is not in good shape, that is a content issue which is not ground for deletion. See also
Article spinouts.
Lambiam12:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.