The result was keep. Bearian ( talk) 01:14, 22 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Prod'ded by ZeroGiga ( talk · contribs) and removed by myself, because I don't think an article like this is a clear deletion. However, it has had no references other than a reproduction of the original EGM article for quite some time now, and despite being a somewhat well-known hoax with real world notoriety, I'm not sure if there's enough verifiable information here for a stand-alone article. I have no opinion on this. JuJube ( talk) 03:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply