- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 04:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Sexual Freedom Coalition
- Sexual Freedom Coalition ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Authoer requested AFD as opposed to CSD for deletion, and I see no reason why we can't honor that request. Originally tagged as alleged to be CSD-A7 eligible. TomStar81 ( Talk) 23:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Toffanin ( talk) 10:14, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Toffanin ( talk) 10:14, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: No indication of importance. The Dissident Aggressor 15:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as my searches found no convincingly good coverage. SwisterTwister talk 05:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.