The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. Ref #1 in the article is a book, not a census document as claimed by the nom and appears to have more than a passing mention, also claimed by the nom. There is more than a passing mention in other books such as
Comprehensive Balochistan General Knowledge. If the article can't be expanded beyond what we currently have, then find somewhere to merge it to. Legends and myths from ancient times should be part of the foundations of any general encyclopaedia.
SpinningSpark19:48, 9 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Merge/Redirect though there is little to merge to
Sibi, where there is a section on history. Even if this is solely based on tradition, there is no harm in including it in WP, though with suitable qualifying comments on the reliability of the information. However any article should be about the polity ruled, not about the ruling dynasty. This would not apply if the area ruled was a handful of villages and/or subject to the suzerainty of a larger state.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
17:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.