The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Sekolah Dian Harapan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails to prove notability and does not reference any sources. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 07:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 14:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 14:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 14:13, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply

• Comment. Based on a number of indirect sources, the Sekolah Dian Harapan system is a group of mid-price National Plus schools (including high schools) under the same auspices as the more expensive international school Sekolah Pelita Harapan. [1] [2] The website for the original Lippo Village location seems to be broken [3], but there is a working website for the Daan Mogot branch here). The Indonesian Wiki has a page for this school with more detail at Id:Sekolah Dian Harapan Tangerang. -- Arxiloxos ( talk) 15:52, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply

• That link is for misnamed, as Tangerang is a city (so it should really talk about the school and not the organization, but that's besides the point). The general consensus is that high schools themselves are inherently notable, but what about the organizations/foundations behind them? Crisco 1492 ( talk) 22:41, 25 April 2011 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. Keb25 ( talk) 23:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.