The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Sekandar Amanolahi-Baharvand (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG, his citation count is anemic (high of 28), and he doesn't appear to pass WP:ACADEMIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete. We have no evidence of passing WP:PROF. That may well be because of the language barrier, but we can't base an article on our ignorance of whether sources exist. — David Eppstein ( talk) 22:39, 28 November 2018 (UTC) reply
• Comment. No opinion yet on the subject's notability. Just pointing out that there is at least one alternate spelling: a Worldcat listing refers to Amān Allāhī Bahārvand, Sikandar. I haven't looked at Worldcat library holdings in a long time, so I don't know if the one book being held in >100 libraries is significant or not. Larry Hockett ( Talk) 05:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.