The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 22:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Minimally sourced
WP:BLP of a community activist, whose strongest claim of encyclopedic notability is his status as an as-yet-unelected candidate in a future election. As always, this is not a claim of notability that gets a person over
WP:NPOL -- if you cannot demonstrate and source a credible reason why he would already have qualified for a Wikipedia article before becoming a candidate, then he does not become eligible for a Wikipedia article until he wins the election. But there are just two references here, and both of them just namecheck his existence rather than being about him -- which means that nothing here constitutes a compelling claim of preexisting notability, and the sourcing provided does not pass
WP:GNG. Delete.
Bearcat (
talk) 20:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as not only questionable for the applicable notability, there's nothing else convincing for any applicable notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.