- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 04:22, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Scott Tanner
- Scott Tanner ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A directory-like listing with no encyclopedically relevant prose. Does not meet WP:NACTOR / WP:PORNBIO. Significant RS coverage not found. Awards listed are scene-related and / or not significant. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 06:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 06:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:47, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as the subject does not meet the notability criteria for a porn actor. - The Gnome ( talk)
- Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey2010 Talk 22:08, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete just plain not notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:52, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per the nominator. Reads just like a CV. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 04:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.