The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. Article does need improvement, but state legislators are inherently notable per
WP:NPOL #1 — they're exactly the type of topic who are so important, so mission critical, for us to have articles about that we have to keep them even if the sourcing is inadequate — the only way to actually get an article about a state legislator deleted is if the article might be a hoax because it's impossible to verify that he even held a state legislature seat at all. But for a politician who was first elected to office 20 years ago, it's incredibly unlikely that their best sourcing would Google well — just because he isn't getting coverage now, when he isn't in office anymore and thus wouldn't be expected to be getting much coverage today, doesn't prove that he wasn't getting covered 10 and 15 and 20 years ago. You gotta get into the archives (ProQuest, Newspapers.com, etc.), not just the Google, to find media coverage from that far back.
Bearcat (
talk)
04:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep clear
WP:NPOL pass. The part about his book and the "Professional Experience" need to be removed because they are clearly promotion, though. Best,
GPL93 (
talk)
17:13, 6 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.