From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:27, 28 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Scarborough crossbow attack

Scarborough crossbow attack (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. This is an unfortunate event, but it is an isolated criminal attack and does not warrant an article on Wikipedia. PK T(alk) 00:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. PK T(alk) 00:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • delete as non-notable crime. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 16:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Every criminal incident that happens at all is not automatically a valid article topic on Wikipedia just because of the inevitable blip of "as it's happening" coverage in the local media. I live in Toronto, so I obviously remember this quite well, but Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS — for something like this to qualify for a Wikipedia article, there would have to be some indication that it satisfies the ten-year test, which nothing written or sourced here does. And the limited media coverage since isn't adding anything compelling either: the victims were his own mother and brothers, so this was a conventional murder and not an "attack" in the way we normally use that term, and the "suspicious package" was a false alarm that permanently disappeared from any further mention as soon as the bomb squad went home. So as sad as the incident was, there's no discernible reason why 2026 would need this article to exist. Bearcat ( talk) 17:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, as WP:NOTNEWS. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.