The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Don't usually close on 2 !votes however sources have been found thus making the article meet AUTHOR & GNG and it seems BEFORE wasn't followed anyway but either way easy keep
(non-admin closure) –
Davey2010Talk 01:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)reply
My extensive and detailed PROD was removed with absolutely no explanations and thus I still confirm everything I said there.
SwisterTwistertalk 16:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. The prod rationale suggested there were only local news sources. Coverage is from good sources from across India, e.g.
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4], plus those already cited. --
Michig (
talk) 07:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment analyzing the listed sources - Here's the thing though, #4 is only a mainly interview, thus only 3 of those sources are acceptable, and I would have only been open to keeping had there either been larger amounts of sources or better ones of substance, thus this is still questionable.
SwisterTwistertalk 01:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.