The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, uncontested. --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 01:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Subject of the article fails
WP:GNG and
WP:POLITICIAN. I can't find any evidence of notability. Wikipedia is not a place to publish the biography of every young people with interest in politics.
Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 15:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. Nothing here passes any of Wikipedia's inclusion standards for people, and the sourcing is almost entirely to
WP:PRIMARYSOURCES.
Bearcat (
talk) 19:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 20:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete his greatest claim to notablity is being involved in founding a new party that is not notable.
Legacypac (
talk) 09:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.