The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This doesn't seem to meet
WP:NWEB. Some mentions in passing, yes, one source is a rewritten press relaese... if there are any reliable, in-depth sources discussing this website's significance, please showcase them here - I couldn't find any. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 04:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(
c) 22:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as varying international publications namedrop SameSame, but nothing to warrant Web Criteria. Secondly, site is no longer active.
Burroughs'10 (
talk) 04:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.