The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 16:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Sal Torres (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL and GNG nothing.found in a before search of any interest Dom from Paris ( talk) 00:11, 2 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris ( talk) 00:12, 2 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris ( talk) 00:12, 2 May 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete Daly City isn't small, but it's not large enough for automatic notability for a mayor. There's a lot unsourced in this article as well that would be very difficult to find verifiable independent sourcing for, which slightly surprises me. Doesn't pass WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. SportingFlyer talk 03:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nomination. - The Gnome ( talk) 22:09, 2 May 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete. The real killer here isn't so much Daly City's population, as the fact that its mayors are not directly elected by the voting public — this is one of those "council-manager" cities where the councillors select the mayor among themselves on a rotation, so that practically everybody on council gets a turn. That type of mayor does not get an automatic presumption of notability regardless of the city's population, but is considered notable only if he or she can be shown as the subject of significantly more than just a smattering of purely local coverage — which means that the sourcing here isn't enough. Bearcat ( talk) 19:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete - fails WP:GNG. Septrillion ( talk) 04:04, 9 May 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.