The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete This article blatantly fails
WP:GNG,
WP:BIO1E, and
WP:NOPAGE. There is no policy that the "oldest x" is notable and this article is packed with longevity fancruft like he was the first president of a particular high school and a breakdown of who succeeded who for what title. His name, life dates, and nationality are best handled on the two lists they already reside on. This
WP:PERMASTUB is not needed.
Newshunter12 (
talk)
02:28, 24 November 2018 (UTC)reply
さいたま市の百井盛さん、男性世界最高齢に [Saitama's Sakari Momoi becomes world's oldest man]. Yomiuri Online (in Japanese). Japan: The Yomiuri Shimbun. June 10, 2014. Archived from
the original on August 12, 2014. Retrieved August 11, 2014.
Delete its a 1Event case - he was reported as the world's oldest man, but no one really knows because there is no central tracting of this. Beyond the repeated report we have nothing substantive.
WP:NOPAGE applies. His name belongs on the lists.
Legacypac (
talk)
06:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Reaching a certain age is an lifetime accomplishment not 1 event. It is an achievement that takes over 110 years and because it is notable, reliable sources begin covering these people. This is how we determine notability here. In fact there are more billionaires than
supercentenarians because to reach such age is more difficult and more notable than earning a billion in net worth. Rarely does NOPAGE applied because most sources do not just state there age, they question their lifestyle to determine how such longevity is achieved. It is only common sense to cover supercentenarians in fact we should have even more articles about them, but this history of deleting supercentenarians has been very destructive to Wikipedia.
Valoemtalkcontrib10:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.