- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:51, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Sadie Vidal ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:Politician. No evidence of any notability. No evidence that this candidate has even been selected by the Conservative party. No reliable and independent references except that she exists and has been elected as a councillor for a ward in Bridgend Council Velella Velella Talk 14:03, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 19:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 19:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Unsuccessful electoral candidate, failing WP:POLITICIAN criterion 3 and WP:GNG in the absence of substantial non-electoral coverage. AllyD ( talk) 19:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 04:41, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 04:41, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Neither local authority councillors nor unsuccessful parliamentary candidates get an automatic presumption of notability per WP:NPOL, but the purely WP:ROUTINE sourcing here demonstrates neither the volume nor the geographic range needed to deem her a special case over and above all the other local authority councillors and unsuccessful parliamentary candidates who don't have Wikipedia articles. Bearcat ( talk) 23:33, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable political candidate. I agree that she does not meet WP:NPOL LAroboGuy ( talk) 12:15, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.