The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unotable person who keeps on getting the prod removed, can't find much notability
Wgolf (
talk) 18:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - no evidence of any notability. Reads like an autobiography of a person who believes being awarded a patent is sufficient notability to be included here. VelellaVelella Talk 18:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - the person has a patent for a device that the article doesn't explain what it does. That's not notable enough, unless their alledged success has good secondary sourcing. As a sidenote, I also added
WP:BLPPROD to the article.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 18:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Joseph2302-it was a blp prod but I had to change it to a afd after the creator kept on removing it.
Wgolf (
talk) 18:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans // 00:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete No signs of notability.
Lakun.patra (
talk) 04:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Snow delete - that this AfD was relisted is a wonder to my eyes.
Tigraan (
talk) 11:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete - for reasons mentioned above BakerStMD T|
C 19:15, 27 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.