The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete G4. — David Eppstein ( talk) 18:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Sachin G Loapure

Sachin G Loapure (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to pass WP:ACADEMIC or WP:BIO. Most of the references given are to the subject's own website, lokapure.com. His webpage [1], indicates a visiting appointment and then an Assistant Professor appointment, followed by two research type industry positions. He lists, some publications and several patents, but his GScholar profile [2] gives a total of only 44 citations with an h-index of 4. There is one solid reference given to a news-story about him, ref number 2 [3]. But there is nothing else in the record that I can see to indicate passing either WP:ACADEMIC or WP:BIO or WP:GNG, and I am not seeing enough here to justify notability on the basis of either of these. Nsk92 ( talk) 17:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Nsk92 ( talk) 17:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete Doesn't pass WP:PROF or the GNG. Joe Roe ( talk) 17:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC) reply

• Comment. Hmm, something interesting here. Apparently this article had existed before under the title Sachin G Lokapure, and was deleted in March 2015 in a prior AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachin G Lokapure. The creator of the current article, User:Dr ram staya, first blanked [4] that prior AfD, and then created this new article, by omitting one letter, 'k', from the last name of the subject in the title. Probably qualifies for CSD G4. Nsk92 ( talk) 17:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.