The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus that notability is not established. I also considered salting both titles, but as the first recreation was done to avoid a copyright infringement, I'm not judging it as repeatedly recreated in the sense intended
Nosebagbear (
talk)
12:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Being president of a minor fringe political party is not an "inherent" notability freebie in the absence of sufficient
reliable source coverage to get the person over
WP:GNG — but two of the five references here are
primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and the three that are real media are not about him for the purposes of supporting his notability, but merely mention his name glancingly in the process of being about the party. This is not enough.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.