The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Completely unsourced, and being a municipal councillor in a town of just 40K people is not an automatic inclusion freebie — while a person at this level of office could clear the bar if they could be
reliably sourced as significantly more notable than the hundreds of thousands of city or town councillors around the world, having a Wikipedia article is not an entitlement that anybody gets just because they exist. In addition, the article was created by a user named "Safees", suggesting a direct
conflict of interest. Delete.
Bearcat (
talk) 15:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as simply nothing else better convincing of the applicable notability. Unlikely anything anytime too soon either.
SwisterTwistertalk 19:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.