The result was SPEEDY DELETE, as either clear advertising or non-notable organisation. - Splash - tk 22:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Non-notable organization, paucity of available reliable sourcing means it fails WP:ORG. Baileypalblue ( talk) 01:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC) reply
VERY FUNNY Bailey! What makes an organization notable??????????????????????????????
Unfortunately, an encyclopaedia is a reference work that contains information on all branches of knowledge so what makes verifiable knowledge such as a registered non-profit organization with a website not qualified to be on wikipedia?
What you need to realize is that, knowledge is not only what is known by you but what is known whether by you or somebody else! I think it is a mark of arrogance and spite to discard knowledge just because you aren't privy to it and do not care to find out.
Do what you may but wikipedia was started by noble people who knew what they knew and decided to share and not by manufacturers of knowledge. I am only pleased the web allows for competition and most once-thought invincible portals became defunct due to such arrogance and thoughtlessness.
Go ahead people! Ask yourself, what makes a piece of knowledge relevant and relevant to who and for what purpose? I have contested this for far too long and I won't do it again! If a few people want to hold knowledge ransom, so be it.