The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Agree with the hathote from 2013 that the page does not meet the GNG. Nothing on the page suggests that this journal is notable.
JMWt (
talk)
10:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. I originally put that notability tag. Nowadays I'd have PRODded it or taken to AfD. However, since 2013 the journal has been accepted for indexing by Scopus (a selective index) and several les selective indices, so this meets
WP:NJournals. --
Randykitty (
talk)
14:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.