The result was no consensus. Some kind of merge-ish solution seems to be called for here. Someone, please, just be bold and follow one of these reasonable suggestions. Mango juice talk 15:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC) reply
The company is not notable on it's own, and given the nature of the company business it would not generate much notable news upon which the article can be expanded. As it is a subsidiary of SATS, would recommend a merge with SATS, or given limited info on the SATS page, a merge with Singapore Airlines Russavia 04:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC) reply
It would clean up the Singapore Airlines category that is for sure, and make such deletion noms less likely. -- Russavia 19:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC) reply