The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete no encyclopedic notability. -- Anthony Bradbury ^"talk" 14:17, 12 April 2016 (UTC) reply

S.N.K.P. Selvam (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable politician. A local town panchayat chairman is not a politician of sufficient rank or standing to merit inclusion at Wikipedia. WikiDan61 ^ChatMe! _ReadMe!! 17:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. According to WP:POLITICIAN, "Just being an elected local official... does not guarantee notability." Furthermore, my searches do not bring up enough material to even pass GNG. He gets a mention or two on a couple of lists, which is insufficient. GAB ^Hello! 20:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete as still questionable for WP:POLITICIAN. SwisterTwister talk 04:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.