From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to S/O Satyamurthy#Soundtrack. Joyous! | Talk 02:19, 25 November 2016 (UTC) reply

S/O Satyamurthy (soundtrack) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant with major relevant content already present at main article S/O Satyamurthy. Fails WP:CFORK. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 11:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 11:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 11:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Should be kept as standalone piece. Target article is a GA and already bulky -- adding these contents there may make the navigation if not impossible, definitely pretty much difficult. Plus, it meets WP:NALBUM#1. In addition to cited sources, here are few more: Music review by IBT, coverage dedicated to songs by HT, another by TOI. Anup [Talk] 23:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The soundtrack article has 2 paragraphs and 1 list of 7 songs. The 1st para is already present in the main article and 2nd para is of an unsourced review and when the success party was celebrated (how encyclopedic!). So how will deleting this and moving a table of 7 songs make the original article bulky and un-navigatable? Also, the new soundtrack article was created post the GA review. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 06:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC) reply
You're right. I overestimated the bulky nature (readable prose size of target article is only 31kb, and article to be merged is about 1kb; together less than 40kb). Also, there is very little scope for expansion (even in that case there will be about 20-25kb left for such expansion). Thanks for following up. Redirect to S/O Satyamurthy#Soundtrack. Anup [Talk] 11:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.