From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_New_York,_2010#District_14. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:45, 24 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Ryan Brumberg (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unsuccessful 2010 congressional candidate, with no other indicated basis for notability. This article was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Brumberg on July 10, 2010; evidently it was then re-created nine days later and escaped further AfD review until an editor spotted and prodded it after 4 years. As an alternative to deletion, we might redirect this to United States House of Representatives elections in New York, 2010 or another suitable target, but given that this has already been deleted once, AfD seems like the right place to go. Arxiloxos ( talk) 04:04, 15 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:33, 16 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:33, 16 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:33, 16 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom (redirect would also be acceptable). WP:NPOL does not confer notability on unelected candidates for office, and while this looks better-sourced on the surface than most campaign brochures for unelected candidates, closer examination reveals that a lot of the sources are primary ones — so he can't claim the WP:GNG loophole either. Bearcat ( talk) 06:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect per nom. A redirect is a usual outcome for failed candidates for federal office. Enos733 ( talk) 21:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.