- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkdw talk 19:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Ruxit
 | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}}; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}}. |
- Ruxit ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
References are press releases or mere notices. DGG ( talk ) 05:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now - Too new to receive much significant coverage with the my searches here (a flashing amount of PR) and here. SwisterTwister talk 06:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Added reliable / neutral sources e.g. gartner. Already 100+ customers. Comparable companies are also listed. scepticeditor ( talk) 11:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)— scepticeditor ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep Although it started poorly it seems it was with good intent, and if you try you can find good sources for the company. AliveFreeHappy ( talk) 17:06, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep there seems to be comparable pages in the same industry, and there's some noteworthy mentions - author and contributors just need to add more sources and meat to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.166.42.90 ( talk) 19:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮ JAaron95 Talk 15:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮ JAaron95 Talk 15:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Weak delete Yes, it's a COI editor who has not followed wp:coi guidelines. And yes, there are a few possible RS, although there are non-RS that should be removed. (E.g. the Forbes articles are by contributors, thus close to being blog posts.) However, this is a product launched less than one year ago, and I think that we should extend WP:TOOSOON to the software category, with a guideline that states that an article consisting primarily of product launch announcements (which, even when in RS are a form of publicity) is just too soon. LaMona ( talk) 16:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 14:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 14:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Admins, please note: COI/SPA alert. Better than your average spam entry, but not seeing any serious coverage. Blogs, mentions in passing, etc. I don't see how it passes WP:CORP. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:18, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Someone above says "if you try you can find good sources for the company", but I am unable to do so. I guess it depends on how you define "good". Someone else says "contributors just need to add more sources", but is apparently unwilling/unable to do so themselves. Overall, I don't think this company meets criteria outlined at WP:CORP. Deli nk ( talk) 13:58, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.