The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--
Ymblanter (
talk) 07:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Nothing here constitutes an automatic
WP:NPOL pass in and of itself, and the sourcing is nowhere near solid enough to pass
WP:GNG — except for a couple of pieces of purely local media coverage it's almost entirely
primary sources. Delete.
Bearcat (
talk) 14:33, 6 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete he is a low level politician in a low level city. If he gets elected governor, and maybe even if he wins a major party nomination, he will be notable, he is not at present notable though, while doing early level explorations of running.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 02:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as there's nothing to suggest better regarding notability for the current questionability and thus delete for now as it's also unlikely there will be any basic notability anytime soon. There's nothing else convincing.
SwisterTwistertalk 02:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.