The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 21:34, 21 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete.
WP:BLP of a city councillor in a city of just 7K. As always, a city councillor does not pass
WP:NPOL just for being a city councillor, except in internationally recognized
global cities on the order of New York City, Los Angeles or London -- for anything below that rarefied level, a city councillor gets a Wikipedia article only if he can be demonstrated and sourced as significantly more notable than the norm. But what we've got here is an article that reads like it could have been posted to his own website (firstname instead of
WP:LASTNAME in body text, natch), and is referenced to a combination of
primary sourcing and
WP:ROUTINE local coverage not even slightly out of the ordinary level of local press coverage that all city councillors always get, which means that none of this is enough to make him more notable than the norm.
Bearcat (
talk) 02:28, 12 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete even the mayor of a city this size would not be notable.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 18:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.