From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  11:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Rokeya Lita (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed WP:AUTHOR. ~ Moheen (talk) 14:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC) ~ Moheen (talk) 14:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ~ Moheen (talk) 14:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ~ Moheen (talk) 14:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Keep Sure looks like WP:BASIC is met to me, e.g., by the Independent reference and [1]. -- joe decker talk 14:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Comment: Online news portal is not highly reliable source, even they have no printed version. Alongside subject does not passed basic criteria. ~ Moheen (talk) 19:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce ( talk) 06:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce ( talk) 06:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 06:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Keep: Independent references are present. I think that the article can be kept. Zombalu ( talk) 11:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Sock !vote above has been struck. Lepricavark ( talk) 19:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.